A virtual community is a social network of individuals who interact
through specific social media,
potentially crossing geographical and political boundaries in order to pursue
mutual interests or goals. Some of the most pervasive virtual communities are online communities operating under social networking
services.
Virtual communities all encourage
interaction, sometimes focusing around a particular interest or just to
communicate. Some virtual communities do both. Community members are allowed to
interact over a shared passion through various means: message boards, chat
rooms, social networking sites, or virtual worlds.[1]
Introduction
The traditional definition of a
community is of geographically circumscribed entity (neighborhoods, villages,
etc.). Virtual communities are usually dispersed geographically, and therefore
are not communities under the original definition. Some online communities are
linked geographically, and are known as community websites. However, if one
considers communities to simply possess boundaries of some sort between their
members and non-members, then a virtual community is certainly a community.[2] Virtual communities resemble real life communities in the sense that they both
provide support, information, friendship and acceptance between strangers.[3]
Early research into the existence of
media-based communities was concerned with the nature of reality, whether communities actually could exist
through the media, which could place virtual community research into the social
sciences definition of ontology. In the seventeenth century, scholars
associated with the Royal Society of
London formed a community through the exchange of letters.[2] "Community without
propinquity", coined by urban planner Melvin Webber in 1963 and "community
liberated," analyzed by Barry Wellman in 1979 began the modern era of
thinking about non-local community.[4]
Impacts
of virtual communities
On
health
Concerns with a virtual community's
tendency to promote less socializing include: verbal aggression and
inhibitions, promotion of suicide and issues with privacy. However, studies regarding the health
effects of these communities did not show any negative effects. There was a
high drop-out rate of participants in the study. The health-related effects are
not clear because of the lack of thoroughness and the variation in studies done
on the subject.[7]
Rather, recent studies have looked
into development of health related communities and their impact on those
already suffering health issues. These forms of social networks allow for open
conversation between individuals who are going through similar experiences, whether
themselves or in their family.[8] Such sites have in fact grown in
popularity, so much so that now many health care providers are forming groups
for their patients, even providing areas where questions may be directed to
doctors. These sites prove especially useful when related to rare medical
conditions
On
communication
Yochai Benkler, in his book The Wealth of Networks
from 2006, suggests that virtual communities would ′come to represent a new
form of human communal existence, providing new scope for building a shared
experience of human interaction′.[18] Although Benkler's prediction was not
entirely correct, however, it is clear that communications and social relations
are extremely complex within a virtual community. The two main effects that can
be seen according to Benkler are a ′thickening of preexisting relations with
friends, family and neighbours′ and the beginnings of the ′emergence of greater
scope for limited-purpose, loose relationships′.[18] Despite being acknowledged as ′loose′
relationships, Benkler argues that they remain meaningful.
by Minzi Catherine L. BAPRM 42616
No comments:
Post a Comment