Digital
television (DTV) is the transmission of audio and video
by digitally processed and multiplexed signal, in contrast to the totally
analog and channel separated signals used by analog
television. Digital TV can support more than one program in
the same channel bandwidth.
It is an innovative service that represents the first significant
evolution in television technology since color television in the 1950s.
History
Digital
TV's roots have been tied very closely to the availability of inexpensive, high
performance computers. It wasn't until the 1990s that digital TV became a real
possibility.
In
the mid-1980s as Japanese consumer electronics firms forged ahead with the
development of HDTV technology, and as the MUSE analog format proposed by NHK,
a Japanese company was seen as a pacesetter that threatened to eclipse U.S.
electronics companies. Until June 1990, the Japanese MUSE standard based on an
analog system was the front-runner among the more than 23 different technical
concepts under consideration. Then, an American company, General Instrument,
demonstrated the feasibility of a digital television signal. This breakthrough
was of such significance that the FCC was persuaded to delay its decision on an
ATV standard until a digitally based standard could be developed.
In
March 1990, when it became clear that a digital standard was feasible, the FCC
made a number of critical decisions. First, the Commission declared that the
new ATV standard must be more than an enhanced analog signal, but be able to provide a genuine
HDTV signal with at least twice the resolution of existing television images.
Then, to ensure that viewers who did not wish to buy a new digital television
set could continue to receive conventional television broadcasts, it dictated
that the new ATV standard must be capable of being simulcast on different
channels. The new ATV standard also allowed the new DTV signal to be based on
entirely new design principles. Although incompatible with the existing NTSC
standard, the new DTV standard would be able to incorporate many improvements.
The
final standard adopted by the FCC did not require a single standard for
scanning formats, aspect ratios, or lines of resolution. This outcome resulted
from a dispute between the consumer electronics industry (joined by some
broadcasters) and the computer industry (joined by the film industry and some
public interest groups) over which of the two scanning processes interlaced or
progressive is superior. Interlaced scanning, which is used in televisions
worldwide, scans even-numbered lines first, then odd-numbered ones. Progressive
scanning, which is the format used in computers, scans lines in sequences, from
top to bottom. The computer industry argued that progressive scanning is
superior because it does not flicker in the manner of interlaced scanning. It
also argued that progressive scanning enables easier connections with the
Internet, and is more cheaply converted to interlace formats than vice versa.
The film industry also supported progressive scanning because it offers a more
efficient means of converting filmed programming into digital formats.
Broadcasters also favored interlaced scanning because their vast archive of
interlaced programming is not readily compatible with a progressive format.
By James Catherine
No comments:
Post a Comment